Elon Musk Cost X

Background

Elon Musk responded to a tweet that mentioned an antisemitic conspiracy theory about Jews encouraging migration to limit the voting power of white Christians. Musk expressed his disinterest in caring about the concerns of western Jewish populations who realize that the minorities supporting immigration may not like them. The theory mentioned, known as the Great Replacement Theory, was cited by the shooter in the Tree of Life synagogue attack in 2018. A source for this information can be found in this article.

Elon tried to recover from this mess but it was too late. By late this week, major advertisers had pulled out as their ads were showing next to nazi content. Media Matters published its report and published the images of the same (below). On threads, one person noted all the things Elon did wrong and all the money that left him. I’d say, to quote, Miss Americana, Taylor Swift

Karma (Taylor Swift) is Elon’s truth coming out home to take ALL his money.

https://www.mediamatters.org/twitter/musk-endorses-antisemitic-conspiracy-theory-x-has-been-placing-ads-apple-bravo-ibm-oracle

Elon also suggests that advertisers dislike your right to free speech.

As the story develops, this is how Elon and team plan to get out of the allegations that advertisers felt uncomfortable. It is not often the actual wrongdoing but the perception of wrongdoing. I don’t think they get it.

Analysis

His disrespect of women continues: All the women left X in droves and joined Threads. On Threads, all the pretty women are following each other. For many professionals in higher education, the anti-semitism was the last straw. It seems like the advertisers have exercised their first amendment right to not spend their money with X.

The almighty DOLLAR has spoken.

Elon has baby mama drama where he seems to triangulate out of his league women (in terms of beauty alone). He seems to pit one against the other like Sophie’s Choice. His stance against one of his children that is trans is equally alarming so none of us are surprised.

Disrespect for Users: reporter, Taylor Lorenz,

MAIN ADVICE: Say NO to Elon already!

I am reflecting on the recent events surrounding X, formerly known as Twitter, and the fallout from Elon Musk’s controversial and anti-Semitic remarks. It’s been disheartening to witness several major companies, including NBC Universal, pulling their advertising support from the platform due to Musk’s comments, leading to a substantial loss of ad revenue.

Amidst this turmoil, X CEO Linda Yaccarino attempted to salvage the situation by emphasizing the platform’s opposition to antisemitism. However, her efforts seem insufficient, and it’s evident that her reputation, meticulously built over decades in marketing and client relations, is now under significant strain.

Musk’s dismissive attitude toward Yaccarino’s role, exemplified in his previous tweet questioning the relevance of CEO titles, only exacerbates the challenges she faces in managing the aftermath of his actions. It’s disappointing to see Yaccarino attempting to defend Musk and the platform despite the growing association with anti-Semitic content and rhetoric.

During a public appearance, Yaccarino staunchly supported Musk, even when faced with potential dissent from the audience. This unwavering support feels misplaced, especially considering the gravity of the situation and the platform’s tarnished image.

The reluctance of Yaccarino and others to challenge Musk’s behavior perpetuates the platform’s issues. Their unwillingness to push back against his actions raises concerns about their complicity, contributing to the ongoing turmoil surrounding X and its association with divisive content.

As an observer, it’s disconcerting to witness the repercussions of Musk’s remarks and the subsequent challenges faced by Yaccarino in attempting to navigate this crisis. The lack of decisive action against such behavior underscores the complexities of managing a platform embroiled in controversy and the ethical dilemmas faced by those in influential positions.

More Advertisers Left the Building:

The impact of advertising decisions by media studios in response to controversies, contrasting advertisers’ hesitancy with studios’ willingness to maintain ad campaigns even amid controversy. It highlights the recent decision by major media companies like Disney, Lionsgate, and Warner Bros. Discovery to pause advertising on X (formerly Twitter) due to Elon Musk’s contentious comments, indicating support for anti-Semitic views.

The studios’ actions suggest concern over aligning their brand values with platforms helmed by individuals whose public statements might alienate a significant audience. Notably, IBM and Apple have also halted advertising on X, reflecting the growing apprehension among advertisers about brand safety and suitability, especially in an era where social media posts can provoke backlash and affect product sales.

Linda Yaccarino, CEO of X, and her efforts to combat antisemitism, but her position becomes increasingly challenging due to Musk’s controversial remarks, leading to advertisers distancing themselves from the platform. Yaccarino’s future in her current role is tenuous. Her resilience is great but she might need to reconsider her position due to the escalating challenges associated with Musk’s controversial statements and their impact on X’s reputation and advertiser relations.

Conclusion

Elon has no idea how to run Twitter/X. He should not have bought it. He should not have alienated the content creators. He should not have fired the content moderation team. He should not have tried to rip out servers in the middle of the night like a belligerent toddler and he has young children, so as a father, he knows that he must create equal opportunities for his 11 children. He failed.

One thought on “Elon Musk Cost X

Leave a comment