Piers Morgan begins by referencing a succinct and pointed theater review he once read, using it to set the tone for his sharp critique of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. He expresses disbelief that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are embarking on a four-day tour of Colombia, invited by the country’s first Black Vice President, Francia Márquez. Morgan sarcastically mocks Márquez’s praise for the couple, who she says have the opportunity to engage with various Colombian communities and highlight the country’s cultural and innovative role.

Morgan questions why this tour is being allowed, given that Harry and Meghan are no longer active royals. He argues that they are merely using their titles to make money in the U.S. by consistently attacking their families and the institution of the monarchy. He finds it galling that they are able to conduct such tours, which give the false impression that they are still functioning royals.He then outlines several points of contention. First, Morgan criticizes the Sussexes for their supposed hypocrisy, noting that they are traveling to Colombia despite the country’s well-known dangers, including terrorism and crime. He contrasts this with Harry’s past demands for taxpayer-funded security during his visits to the UK, which were justified by his concerns for his family’s safety.Morgan also delves into the controversies surrounding the Colombian government, particularly President Gustavo Petro and Vice President Francia Márquez. He highlights Petro’s background as a former guerrilla fighter and points to various scandals, including corruption charges against his foreign minister and accusations that Petro’s son took money from drug traffickers.

Morgan also mentions allegations that Petro cheated on his wife with a transgender TV host. He paints a picture of a government plagued by corruption and scandal, questioning why Harry and Meghan would associate themselves with such a regime.As for Vice President Márquez, Morgan notes the growing public anger over her behavior, particularly her use of luxury helicopters and the construction of a lavish home, which contradict her role as Colombia’s minister for equality. He draws a parallel between Márquez and Meghan Markle, suggesting that both are hypocritical figures who play the victim while enjoying privileges and luxuries.

Morgan’s main grievance, however, is the notion that Harry and Meghan are trying to position themselves as a rival royal family on the global stage. He argues that they want to enjoy the benefits of royal status without fulfilling the associated responsibilities to their King and country. Morgan asserts that their actions are unacceptable and unsustainable, particularly as they continue to trade on their royal titles.He concludes by urging King Charles to strip Harry and Meghan of their titles, which he believes they are cynically exploiting.

Morgan also calls for Palace officials to instruct foreign governments to cease issuing formal invitations to the Sussexes for official tours. He sees their continued participation in such events as a threat to the integrity of the British monarchy, labeling the couple as a “greedy two-faced pair” who are trying to have it both ways—enjoying royal privileges without the duties.Morgan’s article is a scathing indictment of Harry and Meghan’s activities, positioning them as opportunistic and hypocritical, while also casting doubt on the legitimacy of their engagements on the global stage. He sees their actions as damaging to the monarchy and calls for decisive action to curtail their influence.

The speaker in the video is discussing Piers Morgan’s recent article where he harshly criticizes Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, particularly for their visit to Colombia. Morgan describes their trip as a “fake Royal tour” and accuses Meghan of being a “fraud” who plays the victim, comparing her to Colombia’s Vice President. He also criticizes the UK and US governments for having travel warnings about Colombia, calling out the hypocrisy of not addressing similar issues in the UK.

Morgan’s article also touches on King Charles and Prince William, suggesting they are upset about Harry and Meghan’s activities, while he praises Kate Middleton, who is reportedly taking on more senior roles within the Royal Family. However, the speaker doubts the legitimacy of these claims, particularly about Kate, who they believe has always been quiet and subservient.The speaker also expresses frustration that Piers Morgan focuses so much on criticizing Harry and Meghan while ignoring more serious issues, such as Prince Andrew’s alleged involvement in sexual misconduct. The speaker questions why Morgan doesn’t show the same level of outrage toward Andrew’s actions, especially given the severity of the accusations against him.

CONCLUSION

Piers Morgan should not be allowed to publish any materials about the couple. They are within their rights to travel the world and meet new people. I learned a lot about Colombia and Nigeria. There are so many business opportunities. Piers is a spokesperson for the royal family and is close to Camilla. She is on a single path to get more money for her kids, Camilla, that is. Charles be damned. Harry and Meghan have found happiness and living far away from the royal family.