Homewrecker Camilla spotted barefeet, conduct unbecoming of royal family or only for the brown members?
The Daily Mail Article about her being barefoot:
In her Netflix documentary, Meghan Markle revealed that during her first meeting with Prince William and Kate Middleton, she was barefoot and wearing ripped jeans, which stood in contrast to the formality she observed in them. She mentioned that her casual approach, along with being a “hugger,” felt jarring to the more formal British royals. This moment highlights cultural differences in personal interactions and how Meghan’s casual demeanor might have clashed with the stiff royal expectations behind closed doors.
Tina Brown Criticism/Projection:
Tina Brown, a former confidante of Princess Diana, has been highly critical of Meghan Markle, accusing her of having poor judgment and being “addicted to drama.” Brown argues that Meghan misunderstood her role in the Royal Family, expecting to quickly achieve the same humanitarian status as Princess Diana without putting in the years of work. She points to Meghan’s disdain for the 2018 Australia tour and her struggle to grasp the representational duties of the monarchy. Brown also criticizes Meghan’s post-royal life for lacking a clear brand, contrasting it with Prince Harry’s more focused work, like the Invictus Games. Ultimately, Brown believes Meghan and Harry made impulsive decisions, mishandling their royal exit and creating unnecessary conflict.
That is Camilla that had to put in years of work to be accepted. Diana had throngs of people and so did Meghan and Harry:
Meghan and Harry:
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s 2018 royal tour of Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, and Tonga, which is a public relations success. Despite enthusiastic crowds and a warm reception, tensions within the Royal Family reportedly began during this trip. In their 2021 interview with Oprah, Harry revealed that the positive attention Meghan received sparked discomfort among senior royals.
Angela Levin:
Angela Levin, a royal commentator, might have criticized Meghan Markle, claiming you’d never see royals like Camilla or Kate Middleton behaving in certain ways, only for Camilla to be seen doing just that. Angela has been vocal about her views on Meghan Markle, engaging in certain behaviors, as walking barefoot. Camilla was recently spotted doing just that, which some people see as evidence of hypocrisy in how Meghan is treated compared to other royals. This feeds into a broader narrative about biased media coverage and the uneven treatment Meghan has received from British press and royal commentators.
In sharp contrast, no one came to see Charles or Camilla, the home wrecker. She had to put in the time as she was a side chick. She wrecked Charles’ home to become the queen. Camilla ruined Diana till she was hounded by the press. Now they are doing it to Meghan Markle who went barefeet!
Royal historian Tim Ewart, speaking on Sky News Australia’s The Royals in Australia, described Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s 2018 tour as a major turning point, calling it a “catalyst” for their eventual departure from their roles as senior working royals. Ewart noted that the tour was a massive success, with Meghan receiving a reaction from the Australian public that he described as “Princess Diana multiplied by two.” He said the couple “loved Australia,” and the public responded enthusiastically. However, after returning to the UK, Meghan and Harry reportedly felt they received little “praise and recognition” from the Royal Family, which contributed to their decision to step back and relocate to the United States.
https://x.com/myateif/status/1849273653050905083
CONCLUSION
Camilla is the homewrecker. She had to work for it unlike Diana. Diana was a natural humanitarian and Meghan is X2. William and Kate are Camilla’s next targets so she can become the queen. She is really the evil step mother. It’s too bad Charles is too besotted to see it. I argue that men marry the woman they think they’d be if they were a woman and Charles would be Camilla.
celebchai.com 