It’s striking how Tina Brown, a reputed royal commentator, continually singles out Meghan Markle for criticism, while seldom addressing the dynamics surrounding Kate Middleton and Prince William. Could it be that Kate’s concern over Meghan’s growing popularity in the public eye has fueled these narratives? If we imagine Kate keeping a secret memoir of her own, the situation starts to look very different. In fact, Brown’s portrayal of Meghan as harboring a “revenge memoir” might reflect more of what’s going on behind the scenes with Kate and William, who have seen Meghan dominate headlines, sometimes at their expense.
The idea that Meghan’s memoir is merely a “weapon in her back pocket” for revenge—suggesting she’s holding it to inflict harm when the time is right—seems like projection. Meghan has indeed faced immense scrutiny, especially after her departure from the royal family, yet it’s important to examine how the other royals have fared. William and Kate have had their challenges, but speculation around them is often quickly squashed or reframed, allowing the couple to maintain their pristine image.
Take, for instance, the commenters on this particular article. Their responses are a striking blend of outright vitriol and personal attack. One commenter calls Meghan “a cunning opportunist” who supposedly uses her children to “maintain her lifestyle.” Another suggests that she’s “writing stories for shock value” and laments that she’s merely in it for “coins and shock value.” The majority seem consumed by an unhealthy fascination with bringing her down, using phrases like “revenge” and “weapon.” It’s clear that much of the discussion goes far beyond reasonable criticism—it borders on bullying.
If we apply the same level of critique to Kate Middleton, how might the public react? Kate, who enjoys widespread admiration for her poise and discretion, has largely been spared from the intense character scrutiny that Meghan endures daily. Kate’s every action, from her public appearances to her involvement in royal duties, is lauded with praise. However, what if Kate had to navigate the same waters as Meghan, coming from a different cultural background and receiving unrelenting media attention?
There’s an inherent unfairness in the way Meghan has been targeted in these articles and comments. Much of the commentary reflects more on the public’s perception of the monarchy rather than Meghan herself. One comment remarks that “Meghan lives in your head rent-free,” signaling an obsessive focus on her every move. Others echo the sentiment that Meghan has been treated as a “threat” simply for existing in the royal sphere.
While Meghan is portrayed as a conniving opportunist in Brown’s narrative, one has to ask: has the royal family itself, and particularly Kate and William, contributed to this divisive portrayal? Brown asserts that Meghan’s popularity is a mere reflection of her manipulations, but if we consider Kate’s handling of public opinion and the tightly controlled narrative around her, it becomes evident that Meghan has not been afforded the same protective bubble.
Kate, heralded for her “discretion and dignity,” benefits from a media apparatus that shields her from criticism, and her role is never questioned. The comments within the article reflect this one-sidedness. For example, one comment praises Kate, stating she “shows true discretion,” while another laments how Meghan “could never show the dignity of HRH Catherine.” These remarks indicate an entrenched bias that favors Kate, allowing her to coast through similar challenges that Meghan faces under a microscope.
Brown’s fixation on Meghan’s “revenge” or “weaponized” memoir only adds fuel to the fire of animosity, but it ignores the fact that Meghan has been measured in her public engagements since the explosive Oprah interview. Furthermore, should we not question what Kate’s reaction might be in a similar position? Meghan’s mental health struggles, well-documented since her time in the palace, were met with controversy, yet Kate’s challenges are managed far more discreetly. What if Kate’s own memoir touched on these same issues, perhaps showcasing the personal turmoil hidden behind her public façade?
The concept of a memoir being used as a “weapon” seems far more fitting for a royal figure seeking to shield their reputation amidst the potential exposure of behind-the-scenes struggles. If we turn the lens around and imagine Kate in Meghan’s shoes, it’s hard to see how she would have fared any better. Perhaps Brown’s focus on Meghan is not so much an indictment of the Duchess herself, but a reflection of the fears and insecurities circulating within the royal ranks. After all, the monarchy, with its deep-rooted traditions, is slow to change, and Meghan represents a shift that the institution is ill-prepared to handle.
Ultimately, the comments on this article reflect a deep-seated bias against Meghan, as they resort to cheap personal insults and unsubstantiated claims. One commenter even jokes about “not believing a word from Meghan” and paints her potential memoir as a pack of lies before it’s even been written. This type of rhetoric does little more than feed the echo chamber of hatred that surrounds Meghan’s every move. Yet, in the end, it might be the monarchy itself—Kate included—that feels the pressure of being outshone by Meghan, as her global reach and appeal have undoubtedly shaken the foundations of their carefully curated image.
In summary, while Meghan is continuously painted as a divisive figure, perhaps it’s time to ask whether Kate and William are projecting their own fears of losing the public’s favor. The real question isn’t whether Meghan has a memoir up her sleeve, but rather why certain figures within the royal family seem to feel so threatened by her voice.
celebchai.com 