The Double Standard in Royal Coverage: Reflections on a Controversial Headline

A recent headline from the Daily Mail has sparked debate and intense conversations online: “Princess Kate’s old school friend will offer sex parties on the high seas as her orgy firm Killing Kittens launches its first-ever cruise.” The article’s focus on a tangential connection between the Princess of Wales and an individual in a controversial line of work has raised questions about the media’s treatment of the royals and the narratives that dominate public perception.

The reaction across social media platforms highlights the glaring disparities in how the press and the public treat different members of the royal family—especially when comparing Catherine, Princess of Wales, to Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

Social Media Backlash: Meghan vs. Kate

One notable comment by Twitter user @Sussex5525 reflects this frustration: “Meghan would have been destroyed for a thing like this! Even if it was the cafeteria lady at her elementary school or some random woman on the same plane as her, it would have been her fault & somehow they would have involved her. I’m surprised they even print this!” The observation underscores a broader sentiment that Meghan Markle has often been unfairly blamed or scrutinized for circumstances far removed from her control.

By contrast, public criticism of Princess Kate in this instance has been relatively muted, with many online users dismissing the headline’s attempt to link her to the controversial activities of a former school friend. For many, this stark difference in treatment exemplifies the double standard the Duchess of Sussex has endured since marrying into the royal family.

The Nature of “Connections”

Some users, like @MontecitoCamelot, questioned the headline’s framing altogether: “Why exactly are you attaching her name to this?” This valid critique addresses the broader question of whether it is fair to hold individuals accountable for the actions or careers of people they may have known decades ago.

Other commentators chose humor to engage with the bizarre phrasing of the article. @doughaywood quipped, “I can’t get past the phrase ‘orgy firm’ 😳,” while @Marc757251 poked fun with, “Another English rose that Harry didn’t marry.” Such comments highlight how surreal and tangential the story’s connection to Princess Kate truly feels.

Uplifting Versus Tearing Down

On the other end of the discussion, supporters of Meghan Markle took the opportunity to praise her character. A tweet from @NSome1ne remarked: “I really love the fact that she’s out there supporting and uplifting other women—no jealousy, no meanness, no nothing—just out there supporting and uplifting other women.” This sentiment contrasts the often divisive portrayals of women in the royal sphere, emphasizing a desire for unity and mutual support rather than manufactured rivalries.

The Role of Media

What this discourse ultimately reveals is how narratives are shaped by the media and consumed by the public. Headlines like this one—however tenuous their claims—serve as a reminder of how public figures can become collateral damage in the quest for clicks and sensationalism. For Meghan Markle, stories of a far more trivial nature have frequently led to widespread outrage and tabloid fodder, while others in the royal family often see such connections dismissed as inconsequential.

The disparity in coverage raises larger questions about the role of race, class, and media bias in shaping public perceptions of the royal family. It also challenges readers to question the ethics of attaching someone’s name to unrelated controversies simply for the sake of garnering attention.

Moving Forward

As public figures, both Kate and Meghan will likely continue to find themselves at the center of media scrutiny. However, moments like these provide an opportunity for the public to critically evaluate how such narratives are constructed and to demand fairness and consistency in the way individuals are portrayed. As one commenter aptly put it, “This is beyond stalking—they’re looking in with magnified glasses,” a sentiment that applies equally to all members of the royal family. It’s time to shift the focus toward respectful and balanced coverage—because in the end, the public deserves better, and so do they.

Source:

Leave a comment