This case, which has been ongoing for seven years, focused on phone hacking, surveillance, and misuse of private information. While NGN had already admitted to illegal activities related to News of the World, this settlement marks the first time they have explicitly acknowledged wrongdoing by The Sun—a major milestone in the battle against unethical journalism.

A key factor in the case was NGN’s admission of intrusion into Princess Diana’s private life, causing emotional distress to Prince Harry. The court heard that private investigators were used to track Diana and that this invasive media culture contributed to Harry’s distrust of the press. This acknowledgment of past wrongs is a significant moment for Harry, who has long drawn connections between the tragic loss of his mother and the relentless pursuit by the tabloid media.

Harry, who previously settled with Mirror Group Newspapers for £300,000, initially vowed to take this case to trial. However, a last-minute settlement was reached, likely influenced by legal cost considerations and the risk of prolonged litigation. Legal experts note that settlements are often encouraged by judges to avoid unnecessary court expenses.

Impact on Journalism and the Royal Family

This case is not just a personal victory for Prince Harry but a landmark moment in media ethics. His lawyer, David Sherborne, accused NGN of maintaining a “toxic culture”, stating that many involved in these illegal practices still hold powerful positions in media. Sherborne emphasized that NGN’s refusal to send executives to testify in court speaks volumes about their continued lack of transparency.

While this victory strengthens Harry’s long-running battle against press intrusion, critics argue that his fight is selective. Many question whether his own media engagements, such as the Oprah Winfrey interview and his memoir Spare, contradict his stance against media intrusion. Others speculate on whether this settlement was financially motivated, given the Sussexes’ reported struggles to maintain lucrative deals in the U.S.

Regardless of public opinion, this case sets a precedent. It reinforces accountability in journalism, particularly concerning ethical reporting on public figures. NGN’s admission of unlawful tactics is a significant step toward holding media corporations responsible for their actions.

For Prince Harry, this case represents more than just financial compensation—it’s a vindication of his mother’s struggles, a stand against press misconduct, and a powerful message that privacy violations will not go unchallenged.