One of the most damaging aspects of Candace Owens’ argument is her framing of Ryan Reynolds as a “jealous spouse”, using this baseless theory to dismiss Blake Lively’s harassment allegations against Justin Baldoni. This narrative is not only factually unsupported but also dangerously undermines workplace harassment claims by shifting the focus onto a personal relationship rather than professional misconduct.

---

1. Framing Reynolds as a “Jealous Spouse” Dismisses the Validity of Workplace Boundaries

🔴 The Issue:

• Owens suggests that Blake Lively’s allegations against Baldoni were motivated by Ryan Reynolds’ jealousy rather than legitimate professional grievances.
• This falsely implies that workplace harassment allegations are not based on actual misconduct but rather external marital dynamics.

📌 Why This Matters:

• This feeds into the dangerous stereotype that women who speak out against workplace mistreatment are being manipulated by men in their lives rather than making independent choices.
• Workplace harassment cases should be evaluated based on facts and HR complaints—not speculation about a woman’s husband.
• Ryan Reynolds’ presence in Lively’s life does not invalidate her ability to report misconduct.

🔥 Candace Owens’ Flaw:

• She turns a workplace issue into a domestic drama, which distracts from Baldoni’s behavior.
• She implies Lively cannot advocate for herself without male influence, which contradicts the content of Lively’s “dragon” text, where she explicitly speaks about past experiences being ignored.

---

2. Romanticizing Baldoni’s Behavior is a Form of Softening Workplace Harassment

🔴 The Issue:

• Baldoni’s 2 AM voice memo, in which he speaks about wanting “all of” Lively, is deeply inappropriate in a workplace setting.
• Owens glosses over the uncomfortable nature of Baldoni’s interactions and frames his behavior as part of a Hollywood power struggle rather than a boundary violation.

📌 Why This Matters:

• Baldoni’s tone in the voice note is not professional—it is deeply personal and overly familiar for a co-worker.
• Romanticizing workplace boundary violations allows powerful men to dismiss concerns as “misunderstandings” rather than legitimate issues.
• Even if no physical misconduct occurred, persistent unprofessional behavior can still create an unsafe work environment.

🔥 Candace Owens’ Flaw:

• She ignores Baldoni’s boundary-crossing language and shifts blame to external factors like Reynolds and Swift.
• She fails to recognize that persistent boundary violations, even if not overtly predatory, contribute to toxic workplace dynamics.

---

3. Mischaracterizing Power Dynamics: Baldoni Was Not the Victim

🔴 The Issue:

• Owens frames Baldoni as being ganged up on by powerful celebrities, ignoring the fact that Baldoni himself was in a position of power over Lively during production.
• Baldoni was not a powerless figure—he was the film’s producer and director.

📌 Why This Matters:

• A director praising an actress at 2 AM in an overly personal manner creates an unbalanced power dynamic.
• Even if Baldoni didn’t intend harm, his behavior contributed to an uncomfortable workplace environment.
• Framing him as the victim erases the real issue: whether his conduct contributed to an unsafe or unprofessional work setting.

🔥 Candace Owens’ Flaw:

• She ignores the power dynamic between Baldoni and Lively.
• She turns this into a case of “Hollywood elites bullying Baldoni” instead of a case of workplace boundaries being tested.

---

Final Verdict: Candace Owens’ Take Harms Discussions on Workplace Harassment

🚨 The Core Issues with Owens’ Argument:
✅ She ignores Baldoni’s own words, which make him sound unprofessional and boundary-crossing.
✅ She reframes a workplace harassment issue as a case of “jealousy,” which dismisses Lively’s agency.
✅ She excuses Baldoni’s behavior by making him the victim of a Hollywood conspiracy, rather than questioning whether his conduct was appropriate.
✅ She distracts from the power dynamics at play—Baldoni was in a leadership role, not a powerless underdog.

What Should Be the Focus Instead?

📌 Did Baldoni’s behavior contribute to an uncomfortable or inappropriate work environment?
📌 Were Sony’s actions in removing him based on actual HR concerns or external pressure?
📌 Why did Baldoni’s team leak the story to TMZ first?

This is a case about workplace dynamics, not about jealous husbands. Owens’ attempt to turn this into a personal feud actively harms discussions about workplace harassment by reinforcing sexist narratives that dismiss women’s experiences.