The BAFTAs, one of the most prestigious nights in the British film industry, was missing two notable figures this year—Prince William and Catherine, Princess of Wales. As the President of BAFTA, Prince William’s absence raised eyebrows, with many questioning his decision to skip the event. The couple reportedly opted for a private vacation in Mustique, a secluded Caribbean island known for its exclusivity.

This move did not go unnoticed, especially as scrutiny over royal duties and personal leisure intensifies. Some critics argue that, given his role, Prince William should have attended the event to represent the monarchy, particularly at a time when the royal family faces increasing public scrutiny. Charlotte Griffiths, a journalist with insider knowledge of royal affairs, remarked, “If I was being critical, I’d say he probably should be at the BAFTAs because he is its president!”

The decision to vacation instead of attending the BAFTAs adds fuel to ongoing debates about the couple’s work ethic. Critics have long accused the Prince and Princess of Wales of being among the least active senior royals, often comparing their engagement numbers to other working members of the monarchy. This absence, some argue, only reinforces that perception.

Comparisons to Harry and Meghan

Social media erupted with commentary, with many pointing out an alleged pattern in William and Kate’s travel habits. A recurring claim suggests that whenever Prince Harry and Meghan Markle fly privately, William and Kate ensure their travels are commercial to create a favorable media narrative. This speculation has persisted for years, but Charlotte Griffiths’ comments have led some to believe that this is an intentional PR strategy rather than mere coincidence.

“If it’s true that William and Kate deliberately plan their travel announcements to contrast with Harry and Meghan’s, it’s deeply manipulative,” one social media user wrote. Another claimed, “They’ve made it a habit to get good press by playing the ‘humble royals’ while briefing the media against Harry and Meghan. It’s duplicitous.”

The controversy surrounding the Wales’ BAFTA absence has also reignited debates over their workload. “The Duke of Kent can barely walk, yet he was sent to Germany for a royal engagement,” a commenter noted. “Meanwhile, William and Kate refuse to travel internationally for official government business but are more than happy to jet off to the Caribbean multiple times a year.”

Supporters Defend the Couple

However, not everyone is critical of their absence. Supporters argue that Kate Middleton’s recent health struggles should be considered. The Princess of Wales has been undergoing treatment for an undisclosed form of cancer, which has understandably affected her public engagements. Some royal watchers have condemned the backlash, calling it unfair given her health challenges. “His wife has cancer, you vultures,” one user wrote in response to the criticism.

Others believe that, after years of relentless public scrutiny, the couple deserves time away from the spotlight. “After all they’ve been through, they deserve a break!” another social media user commented.

The Bigger Picture

While this controversy might seem like another royal tabloid saga, it speaks to a larger conversation about the monarchy’s relevance in modern times. With an increasing number of Britons questioning the necessity of the royal family, moments like these fuel the ongoing debate about their role in public life. Should senior royals prioritize public engagements, especially when they hold honorary leadership roles in organizations? Or does their personal well-being and privacy take precedence?

For now, William and Kate’s absence from the BAFTAs serves as yet another example of how the royal family’s every move is scrutinized. Whether justified or overblown, the discourse surrounding their choices highlights the ever-evolving relationship between the monarchy and the public it serves.