There’s a growing argument that the disdain aimed at Meghan Markle isn’t about her being “lazy” at all—in fact, it’s quite the opposite. Critics of the royal family point out that while Meghan is busy rolling out real work—from answering early-morning emails and carrying binders to launching charity projects and even producing a successful cookbook—the rest of the family appears content to coast on their titles without much genuine effort.

Key Points:

• A Commitment to Work:
  Meghan has a long history of hands-on involvement. Whether it’s engaging in thorough early-years research, managing solo engagements, or launching initiatives that generate real revenue (like her cookbook), she shows a work ethic that is often contrasted with the perceived inactivity of other royals.
• Downplaying Effort:
  Insiders suggest that the royal family has long tried to downplay Meghan’s contributions. The reasoning is simple: if her hard work were fully acknowledged, it would expose the rest of the family as lazy or disengaged. Her joint panel interviews—with figures like Kate Middleton—are seen as scripted performances meant to conceal this discrepancy.
• A Threat to Fairy-Tale Expectations:
  For many who clung to the fairy-tale narrative of a princess marrying into a life of effortless glamour, Meghan’s practical, sometimes no-nonsense approach is a shock. Her being well-spoken, educated, and actively involved in charitable work challenges the status quo and, for some, highlights their own mediocrity.
• Demonization for Doing the Right Thing:
  Critics have gone so far as to mock Meghan for “carrying binders” or for sending emails early in the morning—actions that, in a typical corporate environment, would be seen as dedication. Instead, these habits are twisted into accusations of being overbearing or “childish.” Yet, these very traits underscore her commitment to effecting real change.
• The Irony of Public Consumption:
  The commentary ends with a pointed question: if you’re so quick to criticize Meghan for her efforts, why is there such a fascination with every aspect of her life? The answer may lie in the uncomfortable truth that her example of hard work, ambition, and genuine care for charitable causes challenges the sanitized, largely inactive image traditionally associated with royalty.

In essence, what some see as an overzealous effort to “do work” is in fact a direct threat to a long-standing system that thrives on inaction and image management. Rather than demonizing a woman who’s actively contributing to society, critics should perhaps reflect on why her dedication makes them uncomfortable—and whether that discomfort stems from her challenging the very narratives they’ve built around royal life.