The ongoing discourse around Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s charitable efforts versus those of the British Royal Family has reignited, with critics and supporters clashing over how philanthropy should be conducted. Recent discussions on social media highlight a pattern—Meghan and Harry’s initiatives, largely self-funded, are expected to remain private, while royal engagements, often taxpayer-funded, receive extensive media coverage despite their often brief nature.

One major point of contention is the demand that Meghan and Harry “do good in private.” Supporters argue that this expectation is rooted in a double standard: when the Duchess of Sussex publicly engages in humanitarian work, it exposes the performative nature of certain royal appearances. The contrast is stark—while Meghan and Harry dedicate substantial time and resources to their projects, senior royals are frequently seen attending brief engagements, often lasting less than an hour, before returning to their publicly funded estates.

The narrative that Meghan’s presence “disrupts” royal operations is further emphasized by the reaction to her continued influence. Some royal commentators express frustration that, despite leaving the institution, she remains a figure of global interest, with her initiatives garnering significant engagement. Meanwhile, the British press struggles to monetize the Sussexes’ absence, leading to a cycle of negative coverage aimed at diminishing their impact.

Additionally, there is a clear divide between how royal supporters and Sussex supporters engage with charitable efforts. While Meghan’s fans actively encourage donations and participation in her philanthropic causes, much of the online rhetoric from royal traditionalists focuses instead on critiquing and undermining her work. This disparity raises questions about the true motivations behind the ongoing scrutiny.

At the heart of this debate is the question: Who does good and hides it? The answer, it seems, depends on who benefits from the visibility—or the lack thereof. As Meghan and Harry continue to shape their post-royal legacy, their ability to attract attention, inspire action, and challenge outdated norms within the monarchy remains a source of both admiration and controversy.