If they had evidence that Meghan Markle was a bully it would have leaked by now.

— Henry VIII (@SussexHenryVIII) June 19, 2021

A recent wave of discussions on social media highlights the double standards in how Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton are treated regarding staff resignations. Supporters of Meghan and Harry point out that while the Duchess of Sussex was accused of bullying due to staff turnover, similar or worse patterns existed in Prince William and Princess Kate’s household (the Macbeths). Various news articles confirm that multiple staff members resigned or were dismissed under their leadership at Kensington Palace.

https://twitter.com/DuchessJRM/status/1408446875943026695

Screenshots from Express, Hello!, and Bazaar reveal that at least seven staff members were sacked or resigned over four years, while Kate and William hired 16 new staff in just one year. Reports also detail how Kate’s private secretary, Catherine Quinn, left her role, and another candidate declined the position, stating she preferred to avoid the publicity associated with working for the princess. These facts contrast starkly with the harsh criticism Meghan faced when staff left during her tenure, further fueling debates about media bias and royal family narratives.

Social media users point out that Meghan was subjected to intense scrutiny, with the British press amplifying claims that she mistreated employees. However, when similar or more significant turnover happened within Kensington Palace, the media largely downplayed it or framed it as a natural workplace transition. This disparity raises concerns about how the royal family, aided by certain press outlets, controls public perception through selective storytelling.

Additionally, comparisons are drawn between Meghan’s experience and that of Princess Diana, who also faced unfounded allegations when she was deemed too independent or disruptive to the royal institution. The conversation has sparked renewed interest in how internal royal affairs are reported and manipulated to shape public opinion.

The resurfacing of these reports strengthens the argument that Meghan was unfairly targeted. Some speculate that the royal family’s strategy involves shifting focus onto convenient scapegoats to protect more senior members from scrutiny. As Kensington Palace continues to experience significant staff turnover, critics are calling for more balanced reporting that holds all royal members accountable equally rather than using selective narratives to villainize certain individuals.

The tweet from @Anna__with_an_A is likely a sarcastic comment criticizing the anonymous palace staff members who allegedly accused Meghan Markle of bullying. The user implies that if those staff members were secretly leaking information to the press while still working under Meghan, they would naturally feel anxious or fearful whenever they had meetings with her or their superiors. In other words, their nervousness could stem from their own actions (breaking NDAs and leaking to the media) rather than any bullying on Meghan’s part. It suggests skepticism about the claims against Meghan and points out a possible ulterior motive behind the accusations.

This ongoing debate underscores the power of media framing in shaping public perception and the role of social media in challenging traditional narratives. The royal family’s working environment appears turbulent across the board, yet only specific members face disproportionate backlash. With more evidence emerging, supporters of Meghan and Harry remain firm in their stance that the mistreatment of the Duchess was not about staff relations but rather a targeted campaign to diminish her influence.

Despite years of scrutiny, no concrete evidence has emerged to support claims that Meghan Markle bullied staff, leading many to question the accusations’ credibility. Social media discussions highlight that if such evidence existed, it would have leaked by now, especially given the royal family’s history of using the press to shape narratives. Unlike Meghan, who had a long professional career without prior complaints, Kensington Palace staff have repeatedly resigned under Prince William and Princess Kate without similar backlash. Critics argue that these allegations against Meghan were a smear campaign fueled by racism and palace politics, lacking substantial proof.