March 27, 2025

Recent media coverage regarding Prince Harry’s charity resignation and speculation about his relationship with Meghan Sussex requires a serious fact check. While commentators like Kevin and Kinsey eagerly spread misinformation, it’s important to separate fact from fiction and examine what’s actually happening.

Charity Challenges: Normal Organizational Growth Pains

The recent developments at Sentebale, the charity Prince Harry founded in 2006, represent typical organizational growing pains rather than the catastrophic failure some commentators suggest. As reported by legitimate news sources, the dispute centers around a fundamental strategic question about fundraising focus – a common point of contention in international charities.

Dr. Sophie Chandauka’s refusal to step down has led to trustee resignations, but this doesn’t diminish the nearly two decades of impactful work Sentebale has accomplished. Harry’s statement makes it clear that his resignation as patron is temporary: “until further notice” are his exact words. His commitment to the organization’s mission remains steadfast, as evidenced by his pledge to “share all of our concerns with the Charity Commission.”

All established organizations face governance challenges periodically. The Charity Commission is precisely the appropriate body to resolve these matters, and Harry’s willingness to engage with proper channels demonstrates responsible leadership, not abandonment.

Meghan’s Business Ventures: Standard Industry Practice

The criticism directed at Meghan Sussex for earning 10-30% commission on products she promotes represents a stunning double standard. This commission structure is entirely standard in the affiliate marketing industry, with rates typically falling between 5-30% depending on the product category. Every major influencer, from lifestyle bloggers to Hollywood celebrities, participates in similar arrangements.

What’s more, Meghan has been transparent about her business model. She titled her show “With Love, Meghan” and openly identifies as Meghan Sussex. There is no deception here – just a savvy businesswoman building a brand in precisely the way countless others do.

The suggestion that the Sussexes “don’t have anything” is patently false. They’ve secured a Netflix deal, Spotify contracts (now concluded), book deals, and various business ventures – all achieved through their own negotiations and talent rather than royal subsidies.

Relationship Reality: Directly From The Source

Perhaps most egregiously, speculation about Harry and Meghan’s marriage persists despite Harry’s direct and public refutation. At the DealBook Summit in New York, Prince Harry explicitly addressed these rumors, expressing that he was “genuinely sorry” for online trolls spreading divorce rumors and dismissing claims of marital trouble.

When a principal party in a relationship directly addresses and denies rumors, journalistic ethics demand that such statements be given substantial weight. Yet certain commentators continue to speculate wildly about the Sussex marriage, revealing more about their own biases than any reality.

Financial Independence: By Royal Decree

The narrative that Harry and Meghan are desperately seeking money ignores a crucial fact: financial independence wasn’t their preference but a condition imposed upon them. Despite the Royal Family’s vast wealth, King Charles refused to continue funding the couple’s security and lifestyle following their step back from royal duties.

This decision forced them to quickly establish income streams to support their family and maintain appropriate security – a necessity given their high profile and the documented threats against them. Their business ventures represent adaptation to circumstances rather than greed.

The Underlying Issue: Success Breeds Contempt

What truly appears to motivate much of the criticism is the undeniable success Meghan and Harry have achieved independent of the royal infrastructure. Meghan’s Netflix show has been renewed for a second season. Products she promotes consistently sell out. Her business ventures continue to expand and find audiences.

For those who predicted failure for the Sussexes post-royal life, this success contradicts their narrative and perhaps explains the increasingly desperate attempts to reframe achievements as failures.

Moving Forward: Focus on Facts

As consumers of media, we should demand higher standards from commentators. Analysis should be based on verifiable facts rather than speculation, personal attacks, or wishful thinking disguised as insight.

The reality is straightforward: Harry and Meghan Sussex continue to build independent lives and careers while navigating the challenges any high-profile couple faces. Their charity work, business ventures, and personal relationship deserve factual reporting rather than fantasy narratives spun by those with clear agendas.

---

This article aims to correct mischaracterizations in recent media coverage with factual information drawn from primary sources and standard industry knowledge.