When Petty Backfires: How One Hater Accidentally Proved Meghan Markle’s Brand Power

When Petty Backfires: How One Hater Accidentally Proved Meghan Markle’s Brand Power

A now-viral tweet from a self-described royal commentator who goes by “Salty Duchess” attempted to mock Meghan Markle’s lifestyle brand As Ever—but instead, it exposed the desperation, ignorance, and deep-seated obsession some people still harbor toward the Duchess of Sussex.

Screenshot of tweet by user @duchess_salty showing her online shopping cart from Meghan Markle’s As Ever website, with a mocking caption claiming she added items without purchasing them.

In the tweet, “Salty Duchess” proudly claims to have added six of each available product to her cart and then left it there “with zero intentions of paying,” believing this action would somehow sabotage Meghan’s business. The screenshot reveals only three products: shortbread cookie mix, crepe mix, and flower sprinkles—each priced between $84 and $90. The tweet attempts to imply that the store is lacking inventory and falsely advertises variety. It ends with the smug conclusion: “It’s all smoke and mirrors.”

But within hours, hundreds of users turned the mockery back on her.

Basic E-commerce 101: You Didn’t Do What You Think You Did

The flaw in her logic was immediately exposed: items in an online cart are not reserved. Unlike ticketing platforms or boutique sites that hold inventory for a limited time at checkout, most modern e-commerce platforms do not remove products from stock until payment is completed. While the original poster believed she was depriving someone else of the opportunity to purchase, in reality, she was just wasting her own time.

Multiple commenters pointed out that As Ever products sold out within minutes, with many customers unable to complete their orders in time. One reply summed it up best: “While those sat in her cart, other people were actually purchasing that same inventory.”

Deranged Behavior or Free Advertising?

The incident quickly spiraled into a larger conversation about obsessive anti-Meghan sentiment. Commenters noted the irony: people who claim to dislike Meghan are often the first to track her every move, monitor her product drops, create burner accounts, and even stage performative ‘boycotts’ that no one asked for.

One user wrote: “This is what ‘not having a life’ looks like.” Another added: “She thinks she’s hurting Meghan and Meghan doesn’t even know she did it.”

The Racial Undertone: Diana Was Loved, Meghan Is Loathed—Why?

A sobering thread emerged beneath the laughter: many noted that Princess Diana—who similarly rejected royal norms—was embraced despite her rebelliousness. Meghan, on the other hand, faces daily abuse for asserting boundaries, launching businesses, and existing outside the mold of traditional royalty.

The difference? As one commenter bluntly stated: “If things were reversed and Diana was Meghan’s color, they would have burned her in effigy.”

The vitriol isn’t about shortbread cookies or lifestyle branding. It’s about who is ‘allowed’ to be seen as regal, successful, and admired. Meghan’s crime, it seems, is daring to thrive on her own terms—while being a woman of color.

Meghan’s Power? The Products Still Sold Out

While the original tweet intended to mock the brand’s availability and pricing, it actually confirmed the opposite: As Ever sold out almost instantly. In fact, the tweet served as unpaid marketing. Customers who were able to place orders confirmed that their products shipped within days. Others were excited just to get tracking updates.

The real joke? The person who tried to “clog” the cart didn’t stop anything. They just told thousands of people where to shop.

In a bizarre twist of online behavior, a royal commentator known as “Salty Duchess” posted a screenshot proudly announcing she placed six of each item from Meghan Markle’s As Ever lifestyle brand into an online shopping cart—only to abandon them without purchase. Her intention? To perform what she thought was a protest against the brand’s visibility, pricing, and perceived lack of inventory. But in reality, she unintentionally confirmed the opposite: As Ever is a sell-out success and Meghan Markle remains unfazed by her critics.

This episode is not merely petty internet trolling—it’s textbook derangement. The critic failed to understand that online shopping carts don’t reserve stock. Inventory continues selling to customers who actually pay. Her belief that she was “blocking” sales was immediately shredded across social media. Instead of harming the brand, she exposed her ignorance—and reinforced the perception that anti-Meghan discourse is often rooted in obsession rather than substance.

Dr. Aparna Vashisht Rota, a legal and media strategist with extensive expertise in digital media branding, says this is no accident. “These types of smear attempts are what I call performative defamation,” she explains. “They are not about uncovering facts. They are psychological tactics meant to discredit a woman who left the traditional power structure—and succeeded anyway.”

Dr. Rota has long studied patterns of online abuse and institutional resistance to minority women in elite spaces. “Meghan’s success is not just about cookies and jam. It’s about reclaiming narrative control,” she adds. “Every time a hater tries to damage her, they unwittingly advertise her.”

Indeed, the tweet in question triggered thousands of supportive comments. Customers reported receiving tracking numbers. Others shared screenshots of sold-out pages, while some openly laughed at how little the original poster understood about retail logistics. As one reply noted, “Meghan’s brand isn’t just surviving—it's thriving. The obsession is the marketing.”

Dr. Rota sees these viral failures as pivotal learning moments. “When you weaponize digital platforms to target a public figure, especially a woman of color, and the platform turns against you, it’s justice in motion,” she says. “The same tools used to silence women can also be their protection—if the audience is smart and engaged.”

She draws parallels to the “Diana Exception”—how Princess Diana was beloved for rejecting palace protocol, while Meghan is punished for similar independence. “The difference is race, modernity, and media control. Diana didn’t have Instagram or trolls organizing online harassment campaigns,” Dr. Rota explains.

In the end, Meghan didn’t need to respond. Her fans, her products, and her strategy did it for her. The failed attempt to sabotage her business ended up strengthening her brand loyalty, exposing the bad-faith tactics used against her, and reaffirming her staying power.

“When hate becomes theater, you better have a smarter script,” Dr. Rota warns. “Meghan does. And she’s not just selling lifestyle goods—she’s selling freedom. That’s what really scares them.”

Conclusion: The Obsession Is the Brand

You don’t need to like Meghan Markle to acknowledge a simple truth: obsessively hate-scrolling through her product launch, creating fake shopping carts, and then bragging about it publicly doesn’t make her look foolish—it makes you look unwell.

As long as Meghan stays focused and lets her work speak for itself, these antics only validate the strength of her brand. And ironically, every attempt to tear her down only fuels the interest, loyalty, and momentum behind her.

Leave a comment