Two Stories from Daily Fail: Meghan Sussex’s Coverage: The “Sources Close To” Phenomenon

Despite recent media reports suggesting the possibility of reconciliation between Prince Harry and King Charles, sources indicate that Harry has “no plans” to permanently return to Britain. The speculation surrounding a so-called “secret peace summit” involving senior aides from both camps appears to have been overstated. While communications staff reportedly met to explore a thaw in relations, no concrete arrangements were made, and Harry and Meghan remain committed to their life in California. This development has been framed by the press as a disappointment for those hoping the rift within the royal family might soon be healed.

Public reaction to the news has been overwhelmingly negative toward Harry and Meghan, particularly in the UK. Comment sections across media platforms reflect a sense of relief that the couple is not returning, with many expressing outright rejection and questioning their motives.

Dominant Themes:

  • Relief and celebration – Many readers express happiness they won’t return (“Thank goodness,” “Best news ever,” “Yippee”)
  • Rejection – Strong sentiment that they’re “not wanted” back in the UK
  • Skepticism – Doubt about their motives, with many suggesting it’s about money rather than genuine reconciliation
  • Criticism of Meghan – Particular hostility toward her, with comments about her ego and inability to handle British public opinion
  • Financial speculation – Many comments suggest they’re running out of money and seeking financial support

Meghan has sold out products. Her wine flew off the shelves. Her second restock sold out in hours. At 50% profit split with Netflix minus the costs, she is profitable. She has the money to fund her lifestyle whatever the cost. When the Daily Mail uses “Her ignominious downgrade,” they’re saying Meghan has experienced a shameful fall in status – implying:

  • She’s gone from a position of honor/privilege to something lesser
  • This change is embarrassing or humiliating
  • It reflects poorly on her character or choices

Public reaction to the news has been overwhelmingly negative toward Harry and Meghan, particularly in the UK. Comment sections across media platforms reflect a sense of relief that the couple is not returning, with many expressing outright rejection and questioning their motives. Common themes include skepticism about financial pressures influencing reconciliation efforts, criticism of Meghan’s public image, and speculation that the couple’s $4 million annual lifestyle may no longer be sustainable. Reader responses—often garnering hundreds of upvotes—reveal a rare consensus across demographics and geographies: Harry and Meghan are not missed.

None of this makes sense. The comments are awful.

One thought on “Two Stories from Daily Fail: Meghan Sussex’s Coverage: The “Sources Close To” Phenomenon

Leave a comment