The narrative surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan’s interactions at the Time 100 Summit highlights societal biases. Critics label Harry as “less than” and Meghan as domineering, reflecting gendered and racialized double standards. Their partnership showcases modern masculinity, as Harry supports Meghan’s endeavors, challenging traditional expectations of marital roles. Continue reading Did Meghan “snub” Harry? Or are we still reading equality as emasculation?

Meghan Markle’s appearance at the Time 100 Summit ignited significant backlash, reflecting societal struggles with a confident, ambitious woman. Criticism often targeted her fashion rather than her substance, revealing deep-seated misogyny. This scrutiny highlights broader discomfort with women who refuse to conform, illustrating how the public redirects its insecurities onto figures like Meghan. Continue reading A Confident Man Doesn’t Need the Limelight: The Strength in Letting Others Shine

Meghan Markle faces harsh criticism in media, particularly from Tina Brown, who labels her as “shallow” and unoriginal for her multiple business ventures. This gendered critique contrasts with how male entrepreneurs are viewed. Markle’s ambition disrupts traditional expectations, and her success, albeit met with skepticism, highlights media misogyny and racial undertones in the accusations. Continue reading Meghan Isn’t Trying to Be Michelle Obama. She’s Trying to Be Herself — And That’s the Problem

The backlash against Meghan Markle for expressing joy while watching ducks reflects a troubling double standard shaped by gender, race, and class. Critics, particularly older white women, are uncomfortable with her happiness, revealing deeper societal issues about who is allowed joy. This scrutiny highlights the persistent policing of Black women’s emotions. Continue reading Why Meghan’s Happiness Triggers Outrage

Megyn Kelly’s April 18 broadcast featured an intense mockery of Meghan Markle, resembling a psychological exorcism rather than satire. The skits were marked by palpable vitriol, targeting Markle’s character and lifestyle while showcasing hypocrisy in Kelly’s criticism. The show surfaced as a manifestation of obsession and cruelty, rather than meaningful critique. Continue reading The Real Parody Is Megyn Kelly: A Response to the Meghan Markle Obsession

The podcast discussing Meghan and Harry’s post-royal lives faces harsh criticism for trivializing its themes of entrepreneurship and mental health. Despite mixed reviews, these critiques overlook their advocacy work and reduce their narrative to royal family criticism. Allegations about Meghan’s parenting and Harry’s legal issues are largely unfounded conjectures. Continue reading The Real Narcissism? Turning Meghan’s Podcast Into Clickbait

The commentary surrounding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry has devolved into cruel satire, obscuring their principles and genuine efforts. Criticism of Harry’s purpose and Meghan’s business endeavors reflects a deeper cultural insecurity and hypocrisy. The episode’s portrayal of their lives is less journalism and more bullying, highlighting unresolved societal tensions. Continue reading Meghan, Harry, and the Weaponization of Mockery: “What Just Happened”

Kevin O’Sullivan’s 100th episode critiques media’s treatment of public figures, focusing on Meghan Markle. It highlights dismissive language toward her podcast, trivialization of Prince Harry’s security concerns, and racial undertones in criticism. The analysis reveals patterns of gendered double standards and media tactics that mask hostility, indicating a need for critical media analysis. Continue reading The Echo Chamber Effect: How O’Sullivan’s ‘What Just Happened’ Cultivates Hostility Toward Meghan