Releasing Lawsuitinfo.com (free court documents so people don’t have to use PACER), a court service that you pay for. It highlights that Justin Baldoni is willing to use social media (he is already accused of astroturfing) to prejudice a case. Thus, while Blake didn’t get an Order to block the site, she won by another point of reference to Baldoni’s parallel legal efforts to influence social media.

Blake Lively may not have needed to move to block Justin Baldoni’s website, thelawsuitinfo.com, or his broader PR campaign, as the documents and information released by his team could actually strengthen her case rather than undermine it. By making court documents and evidence publicly available, Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, may have inadvertently provided material that supports Lively’s claims of sexual harassment and retaliation.

Lively’s legal team has argued that Baldoni and his associates engaged in a smear campaign to discredit her after she raised concerns about his behavior on the set of It Ends With Us. If the documents released by Baldoni’s team contain evidence that aligns with Lively’s allegations—such as proof of coordinated efforts to damage her reputation or corroboration of her harassment claims—they could serve as valuable ammunition for her case. Instead of harming her position, the public release of these materials might backfire on Baldoni, exposing inconsistencies or damaging details that bolster Lively’s narrative.

Furthermore, the aggressive PR tactics employed by Baldoni’s team could be seen as an attempt to manipulate public opinion rather than address the legal merits of the case. If the released documents are perceived as selective or misleading, they could undermine Baldoni’s credibility in the eyes of the court and potential jurors. Lively’s legal strategy, which focuses on presenting evidence in court rather than through the media, may ultimately prove more effective, especially if Baldoni’s own materials end up supporting her claims.

In this light, Lively’s initial move to block the website and restrict public statements might have been unnecessary. The information Baldoni’s team has put forward could end up serving as a double-edged sword, inadvertently validating Lively’s case and exposing the weaknesses in his defense. As the legal battle unfolds, the documents released by Baldoni’s side may become a key factor in proving Lively’s allegations and holding him accountable.

• Legal Battle: Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni are embroiled in a legal feud over their collaboration on the film It Ends With Us.
• Court Hearing: On February 3, 2025, U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman ordered both legal teams to comply with federal rules barring public statements that could prejudice the case.
• Lively’s Allegations:
• Accused Baldoni of sexual harassment and orchestrating a smear campaign against her.
• Claimed Baldoni and his team engaged in “astroturfing” (manipulating social media to sway public opinion).
• Alleged the campaign caused her emotional distress and harmed her family and career.
• Baldoni’s Counterclaims:
• Filed a $400 million lawsuit against Lively and Ryan Reynolds for extortion and defamation.
• Denied Lively’s allegations and insisted the social media backlash was organic.
• Media War:
• Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, made public statements accusing Lively of bullying and launched a website with an editorialized narrative of the dispute.
• Lively’s attorney, Michael Gottlieb, accused Freedman of violating ethical guidelines and sought compliance with trial publicity rules.
• Judge’s Warning: Judge Liman warned against “satellite litigation” over press statements and hinted at possibly moving up the trial date to prevent prejudice.
• Trial Date: Currently set for March 2026, with both sides preparing for extensive discovery.
• Amended Complaints:
• Freedman added The New York Times as a defendant for its coverage of Lively’s allegations.
• Lively’s team is considering adding new parties and claims to their complaint.
• Public Statements:
• Freedman expressed confidence in proving Baldoni’s innocence.
• Lively’s attorneys vowed to hold the defendants accountable and expressed confidence in her claims.
• Key Issues: The case highlights sexual harassment, retaliation, and the manipulation of public opinion through social media in the entertainment industry.
• Ongoing Conflict: The legal battle is expected to be protracted and highly publicized, with both sides determined to fight vigorously.