Blake Lively: Motion for Judgment on Pleadings: The Hidden Safety Net in FEHA Retaliation: Why the Participation Clause Undercuts the Defense Strategy
Latest from the Blake Lively suit. Wayfarer had filed another MJOP (Motion for Judgement on Pleadings https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69510553/1295/lively-v-wayfarer-studios-llc/. Blake replied https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1403.0.pdf and then Justin Baldoni replied https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69510553/1409/lively-v-wayfarer-studios-llc/ A comprehensive breakdown is here https://www.threads.com/@celebchai/post/DXk6CtHFPQK?xmt=AQF0vqVFNwGZglH7xtm2lhXYJJiHFoMT6jiNavnQRbyviw This post focuses only on the participation clause of 12940 (h). The participation clause is the second half of Section 12940(h). The statute has two clauses separated by the word “or,” and each … Continue reading Blake Lively: Motion for Judgment on Pleadings: The Hidden Safety Net in FEHA Retaliation: Why the Participation Clause Undercuts the Defense Strategy